You’ve all seen the movie, but now Forbes Magazine is here to tell us what Kevin Costner knew way back in 1989: It’s Iowa. Well actually, according to Forbes’s new list, The Best States for Business, Iowa is a pretty great place to live, but maybe not so heavenly for businesses.
By the numbers Iowa was ranked the 1st in quality of life (looking at “index of schools, health, crime, cost of living and poverty rates”), but 25th overall. This is probably due to its low, low ranking of 47th in labor (”educational attainment, net migration and projected population growth”), beating out only West Virginia, Mississippi, and Louisiana. Iowa also fell below the half-way mark in economic climate and growth prospects, scoring 31 and 41, respectively.
This brings up some issues looming large in the gubernatorial campaign such as how to get people to come to Iowa and stay in Iowa once they’ve received their diplomas. This is apparent in all of the major campaign topics–education, health care, and the economy. Forbes may think that Iowa is a great place to live, but not a lot of young people stay here after graduation. Back in April I remember Andy McGuire asking me and a few other Grinnell College Democrats what it would take for us to stay here after graduation–something none of us were planning on doing. We liked the sound of bridge health insurance and, you know, good jobs. Although I think a friend of mine wanted a major league sports team as well.
The Blouin-McGuire ticket was not the only one that realized this problem, of course. Culver’s website provides this tidbit:
We can do even better by building on, rather than disinvesting in, our higher ed institutions, so that more students stay in Iowa after graduation and, along with their faculties, help to build the research and manufacturing spin-offs that higher ed has generated for economies elsewhere. My plan will expand investments in colleges across Iowa, including creating Centers of Excellence at each of our public colleges and universities so that each can become a generator of world-class new businesses and economic activity, and better integrate all facets of higher ed with business.
Nussle, on the other hand, says he wants to “empower parents to be more involved in their children’s education,” which sounds like a euphamism for school voucher, something he has consistently supported in the past for private and parochial schools. I guess Nussle isn’t too excited about public schools, or the constitution for that matter, considering he has also voted to allow prayer in schools and also voted in 1994 to only give federal aid to schools that allowed voluntary prayer. I guess that is why the NEA rated him 17% on public education.
August 30th, 2006
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani was in Iowa this week to speak at the “Get Motivated” seminar in Des Moines, raise cash for Lamberti and Nussle, and help sap 50,000 dollars of the state’s cash (what, do you think George Forman was drawing traffic?).
Of course there was another not-so-secret reason America’s mayor was in town—to work Iowa voters and donors in the initial stages of a possible run for President. When asked whether he’s planning to run, he responded:
I’ve got a lot of places to go, and a lot of people to talk to; a long process of figuring out whether it makes sense to run for president in 2008. I don’t know the answer to that yet.
As a native New Yorker and now an Iowan, let me help answer the question—don’t run. Not now, not ever.
Sure, since September 11th, Rudy Giuliani has been getting more good press than Barak Obama (a tall order), and he’s often credited with cleaning up New York and helping to make it the safe city it is today (even though serious crime began to fall drastically during the previous Democratic mayor’s term), but few outside of New York know the other side of Giuliani; the Rudy who policed morality and speech, who flouted the constitution, and who gutted funding for the city’s poor.
At a time when our civil liberties are under attack, Giuliani, who, while Mayor, won only 4 of 26 first-amendment related cases in court, is the last thing the country needs. Here’s a sample of some choice Rudy moments.
In 1999, after the Brooklyn Museum of Art displayed a controversial painting, Giuliani tried to cut the museum’s public financing and terminate its lease. He then threatened to “cut off city financing to any other publicly supported cultural institution” that similarly failed to censor itself. Soon after, he proposed starting a commission on “decency” to review all of the city’s cultural institutions and make recommendations on financing.
In order to cut drunk driving, the Mayor attempted to institute a plan that gave police officers who suspected someone had been drunk driving “the authority to seize a person’s car, sell it and funnel the proceeds to the city — even if the driver turns out to be innocent.” Sure drunk driving is a serious offense and laws against it should be enforced aggressively—but selling a person’s property for a crime they haven’t been convicted of? Maybe Rudy forgot the law part of law and order.
As for helping the city’s poor, the Giuliani administration reduced capital spending on affordable housing by 44% and cut back on the creation of apartments for homeless households by 75%.
And those are just a few of the real winners. Thankfully, he supports a woman’s right to choose, gun control, and gay rights, so he’s socially liberal enough to flop in a Republican primary.
But if some cruel twist of fate gives Rudy a legitimate shot at being President, Iowans should keep in mind who Giuliani really is– a callous bully and a culture cop.
May 4th, 2006