The Most Liberal Iowa Congressman In The 109th?
March 4th, 2007 at 07:54pm Geraldine
John Deeth linked to the National Journal’s ranking of all the members of Congress from most liberal to least liberal. What’s interesting is that, despite the big Democratic year in 2006, Iowa’s most liberal congressman got defeated. That title was held by Republican Jim Leach. Leach was one of the last of the liberal Republicans but lost to the much more liberal Dave Loebsack. Although Leach was a liberal Republican, he voted for the Republican leadership and was one of the worst of the Clinton haters in Congress in the mid 1990s (although he probably wasn’t sincere about his Clinton-hating. Instead, he was just unsuccessfully angling for the 1996 Republican nomination for U.S. Senate against Tom Harkin).
But the fact that Leach was the most liberal Congressman from Iowa means that Democrat Leonard Boswell wasn’t. Boswell was only a mere four places behind Leach (although that made him less liberal than one other Republican, Libertarian Ron Paul.) This put Boswell in a three way tie for the 173rd most liberal member of Congress with Artur Davis of Alabama and liberal sweetheart John Murtha. This emphasizes Boswell’s vulnerable position. He represents a swing district, albeit one where the base Democratic voters are relatively liberal (as opposed to many of Boswell’s fellow Blue Dogs from the South). Boswell has to walk a fine line to protect himself from a primary challenge and to retain his appeal in the district in a general election as much of the rural 3rd District is proving increasingly invulnerable to his charms as a rural Democrat from Decatur County. Boswell has walked this tightrope well in the past but as questions about his health and age continue to build, it will become increasingly likely that he will either slip or be pushed.
Finally, it’s worth noting one bit of trivia. The most conservative congressman from Iowa is not Steve King but rather Tom Latham. While King may be nuts, he at least is an independent thinker. Latham accumulated a more conservative record by being a straight party-line, pro-corporate Republican hack. It allows Latham the benefit of a seat on the Appropriations Committee for the small cost of independent thought and free will. One hopes that Selden Spencer will use this information to his advantage for his second bid for the 4th District.
Related Posts
- Nussle Hearts DeLay
- Ladora, IA: Stronghold of Socialism
- Where Does Leonard Boswell’s Money Come From?
- Bill Richardson: Peace, Love and an A rating from the NRA?
- Congressional Quarterly Interviews Braley
Entry Filed under: Campaign 2006, US Congress, US House, Leonard Boswell, Dave Loebsack, Tom Latham, Steve King
Related Searches: john murtha, leonard boswell, clinton haters, jim leach, republican nomination
2 Comments Add your own
1. Nate Green | March 9th, 2007 at 3:52 pm
How do you figure Tom Latham is more conservative than Steve King. Steve King was given a perfect score of 100 by the American Conservative Union. Tom Latham received an 84 with Nussle trailing close behind with a 79.
2. Adam Smith | April 9th, 2008 at 8:28 am
Tom Latham had 69 million dollars in earmarks. Third most among republicans
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed