<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Vilsack and Money</title>
	<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/23/tom-vilsack-and-money/</link>
	<description>Politics in Iowa from a progressive viewpoint.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/23/tom-vilsack-and-money/#comment-7899</link>
		<author>jeremy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/23/tom-vilsack-and-money/#comment-7899</guid>
					<description>I don't think your analysis is correct. Compared to other candidates, Vilsack didn't have that many hired hands. His problem was that he just wasn't generating interest. Money comes with buzz. Vilsack had zero buzz.

Vilsack's candidacy was a sleeper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think your analysis is correct. Compared to other candidates, Vilsack didn&#8217;t have that many hired hands. His problem was that he just wasn&#8217;t generating interest. Money comes with buzz. Vilsack had zero buzz.</p>
<p>Vilsack&#8217;s candidacy was a sleeper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
