<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mary Lundby Is Illiterate</title>
	<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/</link>
	<description>Politics in Iowa from a progressive viewpoint.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: T.M. Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7607</link>
		<author>T.M. Lindsey</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7607</guid>
					<description>"...the double entendre has new meaning in the fact that it shows up in every other sentence."

So would this be a double-secret entendre???

So on the literal level, when Lundby says she's "seen the deteriation of things we consider taboo" she's concened  that our time-honored taboos are deterioating?

Or is she using a loosely-veiled double entendre to expose her deepest desires and hidden intentions? Ah yes, Mary, the pen's proverbial prowess is mightier than the sword's unweilding power...

Or is she using a double-secret entendre to mask the taboo and perpetual decay of proper grammar usage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the double entendre has new meaning in the fact that it shows up in every other sentence.&#8221;</p>
<p>So would this be a double-secret entendre???</p>
<p>So on the literal level, when Lundby says she&#8217;s &#8220;seen the deteriation of things we consider taboo&#8221; she&#8217;s concened  that our time-honored taboos are deterioating?</p>
<p>Or is she using a loosely-veiled double entendre to expose her deepest desires and hidden intentions? Ah yes, Mary, the pen&#8217;s proverbial prowess is mightier than the sword&#8217;s unweilding power&#8230;</p>
<p>Or is she using a double-secret entendre to mask the taboo and perpetual decay of proper grammar usage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calling BS on the stem cell rhetoric at Political Forecast</title>
		<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7612</link>
		<author>Calling BS on the stem cell rhetoric at Political Forecast</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7612</guid>
					<description>[...] debated in committee yesterday &#8212; and passed out of committee &#8212; last week, as quoted here by Iowa Progress. Read their post for more, but its clear that Republicans at both the national and state level are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] debated in committee yesterday &#8212; and passed out of committee &#8212; last week, as quoted here by Iowa Progress. Read their post for more, but its clear that Republicans at both the national and state level are [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stem cell bill passes the Iowa Senate at Political Forecast</title>
		<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7655</link>
		<author>Stem cell bill passes the Iowa Senate at Political Forecast</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7655</guid>
					<description>[...] Register notes in their story, the critics claimed the bill would legalize cloning. As the folks at Iowa Progress have already pointed out, that is pure bullshit. If the Democrats were persuaded by that type of argument, I suggest Senator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Register notes in their story, the critics claimed the bill would legalize cloning. As the folks at Iowa Progress have already pointed out, that is pure bullshit. If the Democrats were persuaded by that type of argument, I suggest Senator [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusty</title>
		<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7671</link>
		<author>Dusty</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7671</guid>
					<description>Somatic cell nuclear transfer is cloning so this bill directly creates a new class of cloning, "Human reproductive cloning", and indirectly another, "Human nonreproductive cloning".  The bill does prohibits the former but allows for the latter which in effect lifts the ban of all cloning signed into law by Gov. Vilsack in 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somatic cell nuclear transfer is cloning so this bill directly creates a new class of cloning, &#8220;Human reproductive cloning&#8221;, and indirectly another, &#8220;Human nonreproductive cloning&#8221;.  The bill does prohibits the former but allows for the latter which in effect lifts the ban of all cloning signed into law by Gov. Vilsack in 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Greening</title>
		<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7736</link>
		<author>B Greening</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-7736</guid>
					<description>All of your own semantics are fine but CLONING is CLONING whether you want to state the HUMAN cloning is not REPRODUCTIVE cloning or not.  Human cells (eggs &#38; sperm) are used adn therefore it is HUMAN cloning.  Implantation makes it reproductive but even PRIOR to implantation, a human embryo is created and then will be destroyed in the vain name of science!  Shame on IOWA if this bill is passed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of your own semantics are fine but CLONING is CLONING whether you want to state the HUMAN cloning is not REPRODUCTIVE cloning or not.  Human cells (eggs &amp; sperm) are used adn therefore it is HUMAN cloning.  Implantation makes it reproductive but even PRIOR to implantation, a human embryo is created and then will be destroyed in the vain name of science!  Shame on IOWA if this bill is passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Progress &#187; State Senate Helps Close The Fallon Loophole</title>
		<link>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-25156</link>
		<author>Iowa Progress &#187; State Senate Helps Close The Fallon Loophole</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowaprogress.com/2007/02/13/mary-lundby-is-illiterate/#comment-25156</guid>
					<description>[...] Hatch, who represents Fallon&#8217;s former district and has to kowtow to Fallon&#8217;s base and Mary Lundby, the former Republican leader in the Senate who openly displayed her contempt for organized labor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hatch, who represents Fallon&#8217;s former district and has to kowtow to Fallon&#8217;s base and Mary Lundby, the former Republican leader in the Senate who openly displayed her contempt for organized labor [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
