http://iowaprogress.com/2006/12/29/more-wacky-caucus-poll-numbers/ Politics in Iowa from a progressive viewpoint. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:39:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 http://iowaprogress.com/2006/12/29/more-wacky-caucus-poll-numbers/#comment-6686 Dave Michaels Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:30:19 +0000 http://iowaprogress.com/2006/12/29/more-wacky-caucus-poll-numbers/#comment-6686 I'm thinking that ARG doesn't know how to do a sufficiently tight screen on "likely caucus-goers." Mysterypollster has made the point in the past that the screen needs to be really, really tight, because a very low percentage of even "likely voters" actually ends up at the caucuses. I’m thinking that ARG doesn’t know how to do a sufficiently tight screen on “likely caucus-goers.” Mysterypollster has made the point in the past that the screen needs to be really, really tight, because a very low percentage of even “likely voters” actually ends up at the caucuses.

]]> http://iowaprogress.com/2006/12/29/more-wacky-caucus-poll-numbers/#comment-6690 Hannah Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:14:28 +0000 http://iowaprogress.com/2006/12/29/more-wacky-caucus-poll-numbers/#comment-6690 Sounds dead on, Dave. I wonder if we should expect accurate polls to look more stagnant then, even from election cycle to election cycle. Sounds dead on, Dave. I wonder if we should expect accurate polls to look more stagnant then, even from election cycle to election cycle.

]]>