Father-Son Day on the Ballot

Recommend...del.icio.us Digg it Furl Netvouz Netscape Newsvine reddit Yahoo MyWeb August 15th, 2006 at 09:23pm Geraldine

Yesterday’s Times had a quasi-interesting article noting a more interesting phenomenon in upcoming elections: three sons of Democrats defeated in the Republican tide of 1980 are attempting to win a rematch.

Chet, Jack Carter, and Evan Bayh’s (’08) fathers were all casualties of the year in which the party lost “the White House, the Senate, a generation of Midwestern liberals and, in some ways, its confidence that it was the natural, even inevitable, majority party.” Naturally, their political personas are heavily influenced by their fathers’ electoral experiences.

Bayh learned to view defeat as “an occupational hazard,” while Chet remarked that “The great thing about it was my father gave it everything he had, stayed true to his values, was very principled and focused, and went down with a great fight. It was very inspiring.” (Awww.)

The article half-assedly examines the difference in messaging between fathers and sons, saying that “the elder Mr. Bayh and Mr. Culver were invariably described as liberals; the sons, in recent interviews, avoided the term.” Three paragraphs down Chet is quoted describing himself as a “proud, progressive Democrat.” While it is interesting that many have begun substituting “progressive” for “liberal,” shame on the Times for not delivering a more subtle analysis of differing political approaches.

Related Posts

• Caucuses Pit Father Vs. Son In Major Iowa Political Family
• Obama’s Early Life Scrutinized From Abroad
• Focus on the Family Focuses on Iowa
• Vaudt Considering Run For Governor?
• Possible Endorsement For Richardson?

Entry Filed under: Miscellaneous, Campaign 2006, Gubernatorial, Democratic Party, President 2008

Related Searches: evan bayh, progressive democrat, subtle analysis, political approaches, jack carter