http://iowaprogress.com/2006/03/17/if-i-were-governor/ Politics in Iowa from a progressive viewpoint. Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:43:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 http://iowaprogress.com/2006/03/17/if-i-were-governor/#comment-32 noneed4thneed Sat, 18 Mar 2006 04:27:01 +0000 http://iowaprogress.com/2006/03/17/if-i-were-governor/#comment-32 Vilsack has not endorsed Culver. Vilsack has not endorsed anyone. If he did, it would probably be Blouin. Vilsack has not endorsed Culver. Vilsack has not endorsed anyone. If he did, it would probably be Blouin.

]]> http://iowaprogress.com/2006/03/17/if-i-were-governor/#comment-33 Freeda Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:51:37 +0000 http://iowaprogress.com/2006/03/17/if-i-were-governor/#comment-33 Whoops. Thanks for the correction. I thought that he had endorsed Culver. But let's chalk that one up to a St. Patrick's day haze. Whoops. Thanks for the correction. I thought that he had endorsed Culver. But let’s chalk that one up to a St. Patrick’s day haze.

]]> http://iowaprogress.com/2006/03/17/if-i-were-governor/#comment-36 Matt Gardner Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:16:11 +0000 http://iowaprogress.com/2006/03/17/if-i-were-governor/#comment-36 Actually, what Vilsack said about the Touchplay ban was a little more nuanced than "I will sign the bill." From the DM Register: "The machines are in or out. That is a decision the Legislature has got to make. I will respect whatever decision they make in that regard." A stance like that makes pretty much every other candidate sound good, I'd say. At least the other guys all picked sides on an important ethical and fiscal issue... Actually, what Vilsack said about the Touchplay ban was a little more nuanced than “I will sign the bill.” From the DM Register: “The machines are in or out. That is a decision the Legislature has got to make. I will respect whatever decision they make in that regard.” A stance like that makes pretty much every other candidate sound good, I’d say. At least the other guys all picked sides on an important ethical and fiscal issue…

]]>